About Me

Name:Puddleglum
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

On political 'hopes of the world' and 'saviors' and other kooky ideas.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Larry Norman died the last Sunday of February 2008

Mr. 'One Way to Heaven' sign, Mr. The Original Jesus Freak of the Jesus Movement, Mr. You've Been Left Behind and Wish We'd All Been Ready gets to see Jesus before the parousia.

I must admit I'm sad about this though heaven has another Live-Wire on its hands. Larry clearly had his spiritual ups and downs as we all do but he was a trophy of God's grace. In the midst of the ongoing 'bless me' music Larry wrote about VD/STDs, civil religion, racism, UFOs, the 2nd coming of Christ, false notions of Jesus, etc. and did so in a fresh style that was current with the dominant youth culture music of his day. Kind of the original CCM in a Christian culture that was monopolized by hymns-only (believe it or not! we could use a few more of those these days!). Larry wrote 'The Six O'Clock News' on media bias long before Coulter or Limbaugh!

Too few write music on such themes from a Christian worldview even today but when people speak a word of Scripture to a current brokenness it seems to me it is always something commendable. Larry did it with "Only Visiting this Planet" and other works. Keith Green did it with "So You Want to Go Back to Egypt" and other works. Others follow in the trail they blazed. Sure there are the songs on what the culture tells us is important like AIDs and environmental concerns but who is writing today about human cloning, harvesting human eggs, human trafficking, preventive war, discernment about Sharia, global terror etc? A lot of the Jesus Movement sadly has become its own subculture. There are noteworthy exceptions and I believe that revival has lasting, righteous, and even profound impact but it must be spiritually discerned when market forces seek to pedal it for pedaling sake.

Christians (like Larry Norman) in the arts are often aware that they are on enormously needy ground. The arts are full of super egos, super marketed, super prostituted (at times), fickle fads and fans and are intense contexts for inappropriate, performance-based self-esteem/human dignity, or the lack thereof, drivenness, perfectionisms... good night it is a mine field. To be there and take a stand for righteousness and not be molded by it is very tricky. Booking agents, the need for the next big gig or award, how to wow them one more time...it is easy to lose focus on glorifying God and having a clear witness for Him in character, community, and content.

But death is a reminder of an empty tomb, and of a glorious reunion, of new bodies, of a new earth and heaven, of the ultimate victory of King Jesus. And it puts time and fortune and relationships...well actually the resurrection of Jesus from the dead and the super-real prospect of His any-moment return puts EVERYTHING in perspective! Jesus Lordship, our finite, frail, fallible, fallen status comes into focus and His glorious salvation as well.

How can one view such things and not turn from the self-centered life? Or see these things and not rely fully and only on Christ's substitutionary death for forgiveness of sin with great gratitude? Or not receive Him into the core of our being for empowerment over sin and His abiding Presence with us? How can one speak of knowing Jesus as a religious or therapeutic savior and not as King and rightful Lord whose word is our manifesto and unquestionably authoritative and true.

Thanks Larry for being a wonderful even if imperfect example of being a Christ follower who often thought and served and worshiped outside the box of mere political and denominational tribalisms, and various other group-think, conformities. Some musicians get merely knighted here below with mortal approval, but today I suspect we can thank you, Sir Norman. Thank you kindly!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Opportunities for scholars

Did you miss the April 07 Graduate and Faculty Ministry retreat at the UW Madison? Too bad if you did ... But Wait...!

All the plenary sessions were digitally recorded and stream on the web or you can click & hold, or right-click them and download them to your mp3 player! Also all the handouts and powerpoints are up online as well! You may have missed the road trip, fellowship with colleagues, and the nice Spring weather and bomfire but the content is right here for you.

http://www.gfmuiuc.net/april07conference/Site/Audio.html

I would highly recommend the two sessions with Sharon Gartland and with Ric Ashley and the breakout with James Southard for men. The other breakout was good if you are interested in the new theology of Paul and Sanders and such but I recommend with some reservations as I had a significant amount of questions on this, but if you are into NT Wright and his thoughts on Sanders, you may well appreciate this session a lot, as well.

=== === === === === === === === === === ===

OK, but what awaits me? Check out this two page pdf brochure with Stanton L. Jones on "Sexual Ethics, Faith, and the University", in Toledo, OH., June 8-10, here http://mwgfm.org/images/June07GLE.pdf

That's it? No, there's more. July 12-14 in Kansas City, Missouri "Truth Under Deconstruction" with Paul Vitz, Norman Geisler, and J.P. Moreland here http://www.iics.com/

Faculty Conference. Cedar Campus. "In Thy light we see light" http://www.intervarsity.org/gfm/event_item.php?id=816 Dr. Michael J. Murray (Philosophy), Dr. Daniel J. Trier (Theology), Dr. Steven Telian (Otolaryngology). June 16-22, 2007.
"Nexus: The Future of Healthcare, Science, and Humanity" Center for BioEthics and Human Dignity, July 12-14, 2007. http://www.cbhd.org/conferences/2007/index.htm Dr.Alvin Plantinga, Dr. David Prentice, Dr. Christina Bieber Lake, Joni Erickson Tada, Dr., Dr. Brent Waters, O.C. Snead J.D., Nigel Cameron.

OK, that's it. Have a great day and enjoy the fabulous resources from scholars with a living faith that influences their thinking, teaching, research, publishing, and public witness!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Constitutional Musings on '24' miss much

It seems to me that the discussion of Constitutional issues in the TV series '24' these first couple weeks of February have been missing the point entirely.  The pro-national security voices are exaggerated and the Constitutional purist voices are likewise confused.  Read more on this here http://www.pgfoot.org  Clearly I do not know the direction the plot will follow, but it just seems odd that both parts of a discussion on an important document and the framers' intent would miss out on being close to accurate almost entirely.  Perhaps we'll get closer to an actually Constitutional discussion in future episodes if Jack, his brother and his father can stop holding each other at gun point and torturing each other.  Goodness.  Bring back 'The Mummy' and Mar-One episode genre or however it (Mar One) was spelled.  The entire last series was on the secret government on the side of the terrorists.  Where the USA government is the problem and source of terrorism.  I was glad to see '24' and the network mention of limited use of nuclear weapons in terror as not merely potential but more seriously as a 'what if' in a TV show.  But the torture volley needs to end.  It is silly.  It seems to be designed to strengthen the discussion on the Constitution but when none of the voices are really 'getting it', it seems like a lot of heat with no clear substance.  What's your take?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Baker Repudiation Bush?

It is ridiculous to think as Kerry and all the media talking heads were saying the other night, even having Pat Buchanan agreeing with Salon and the New Republic, that the Baker blues-ribbon panel report totally repudiates Bush.  How does it do that by keeping us in Iraq through 2007 and increasing our presence?  It repudiates Bertha Butts, ahem I mean Senator Murtha and his buts. 

Perhaps on human rights and impeachment day, Sunday December 10th we can all just add names to the 'who all we want impeached list'.  I have a few in mind.  Senator Kerry, Senator Durbin, Senator Murtha, Senator Kennedy, and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in California would be a good start.  Or we could impeach, since nobody is giving any credible legal reasons Justice Souter just for being duplicitous about his values during his confirmation hearings and then turning out to be just ordinary stupid, or Justice Stevens for being senile...

I hear there is a new, not just blue but red, white, and blue-ribbon panel report of one that has just been released and is being mused all over the nation.  It gives a quick three summary of the Baker/O'Connor old people report and then gives nine intriguing suggestions on how to win the war on terror in less than a year.  Click here to give it a read and or comment on the blog. 

Sometimes the stress of the holidays can deplete your system, click here to refresh it with high power nutrition, or click here to order evangelistic resources for our military heroes to help them informally defend and share the truth of Jesus in a non-manipulative, honest, intellectually engaging manner with their Iraqi colleagues and fortify themselves against jihadist and anti-reason, manipulative politics of the jihadist religious factions.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Puddleglum's Reading

Puddleglum has a reading program and you can check it out here.  While a certain very popular author is not in the program at the current time, I thought I really should make a link to her archived articles (thank you Ann) here.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bin Laden Blue Dress

Sometimes cynics can be so overpoweringly funny and Ann Coulter surely hits it with this article "If only Bin Laden had a Stained Blue Dress".  Give a quick read here.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Open Letter Abortion FDA

Dear Mr. President George W. Bush,

Joseph Farah writes below about what many of us prolife supporters are greatly perplexed about. We've campaigned for you for constitutional, originalist, justices because we believe words have a meaning that is significantly knowable, and because we value human life, marriage, family, society, country and yes because we are pro-life. We've done the same in backing your ban on embryonic destruction for stem cell research.  Like you, we didn't find the "because they were going to die anyway" argument persuasive as such was used in justifying experiments with black males in Tuskegee and we only wondered why you didn't use the bully-pulpit to discourage the private sector from messing with human embryos as well. We've backed your ban but apparently now un-enforceable ban on partial birth abortion.

Your pro-life stand, justices, and stand for marriage are some of the rock solid reasons why you are highly admired by many including myself. And yes, your stand on the war on terror and backing of our friend Israel too. But Mr. President I believe you have surrounded yourself with advisors that help you triangulate and doing so for a term and a half has put you on the compromise fence a few times and this recent decision about the abortion pill has put you sadly, discouragingly, and dispassionately on the very wrong side of this issue.

There are ways to change this and dislodge yourself. Frankly Sir, you should have listened to the highly supportive and passionate, middle American voices that helped you defeat Kerry and Gore. People like the Christian Legal Society, the Christian Medical Dental Society, Family Research Council, Mr. Charles Colson, and others. I think Joseph Farah's article should have contained some qualifying words and conditions in its bottom line but none the less, I resonate with his article on this issue more than with your recent FDA person's decision and his (frankly) defiling of your legacy with it.  

Please get this changed. Pro-Lifers are numerous and we notice. I'm hoping this was a case of Bill Frist recommendation and friendship loyalty that wasn't well researched. Bill is not doing himself or the Republican Party much good in the highly partisan Senate. Not on life issues and not for us values voters, Sir. Thanks for considering this appeal seriously.  I hope the public doesn't punish conservative Republicans in the House for compromised 'correctness' in the Republican Senate.  You Sir, are no John Kerry or Edwards as this ad well underscores.  It shouldn't take Harriet Meirs kind of media heat for your moral compass to discern what is happening here and adjust. Fortunately an error in FDA judgment isn't likely to be as front page damaging IF corrected. See Joseph Farah's article below.

Yours sincerely,

Joe B. Whitchurch

----------------------------------------------------------------

Bush Approves Abortion Pill?  by Joseph Farah

Just what does Bush believe?  © 2006 
Farah's article is rather cynical and can be read by clicking here.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Great Coulter Review

My good friend Bill Muehlenberg in Australia has given a fabulous review and succinct summary of Ann Coulter's book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism".  For a long time I've wondered why religious, christian cults get strong critiques and analysis but leftist pulpits with the same sorts of reductionistic naturalism get softball questions and nicey nice talk by cultured elitists.  If such gets under your skin and you believe you've no time to read her book, read my friend's fabulous review here.  Good one Bill!  Nice web page articles in general as well. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Younger than I.D....?

I was sent this article by my friend Kevin Johnson who apparently got it from his friend Fred.  The link is to the Smithsonian Magazine.  Like many debates these days the question framing tells everything.  Is the earth billions of years old with punctuated supernatural creative acts as most in the ID movement endorse, or older and with no special, intelligent, creative interventions or acts?  That's the big question.  But hold your breath, could even the ID model be granting too much age to the earth?  Try not to pass out and read the article below.

http://www.smithsonianmagazine.com/issues/2006/may/dinosaur.php  This article shows that there is soft tissue in dinosaur bones that were thought to be void of such material due to the decay/fossilization process that destroys soft tissue over time.

The persistent denial that the existence of soft tissue in a dinosaur can mean that the dinosaur is not millions of years old, reminds me of the joke about the man who went to the psychiatrist because he thought he was dead.  The doctor showed him repeatedly in an empirical way that dead men do not bleed by taking him to morgues and sticking cadavres. He asked if the man were convinced that dead men do not bleed? When the man answered in the affirmative the doctor stuck him in his finger with a small needle. When the blood appeared the man shouted out, "Dead men do bleed after all!" This is akin to the "scientists" saying that this means that they must be mistaken about "the process of decay!"

The lead paleontologist who claims that she likes the idea that God cannot be proved evidentially from the Creation must not be aware of these words in Romans1:20: "For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse."

It is hard not to think this debate between old earth naturalists and old earth ID people isn't bleeding and dead to certain inconvenient truths.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Young journalist promising

 
You may not like all his style and such, but something about him...you just gotta love this young man.
 
His expose' of a glaring double standard, the C.S. Lewis quote and in context, the bottom line paragraph on material needs and despair,...does this not just burst forth needing to be declared boldly?  Even his understanding of the central teaching of the gospel or the relationship of the creation to Creator, amazingly clear for a young journalist. May young journalists like this one increase! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pretty good flick

I saw this movie at the matinee' price entering rather suspicious of Oliver Stone and ended up rather agreeing with this honest film critic below. 
 
I wouldn't pay top price and I wouldn't attend anticipating a lot of speculative stuff like the films on the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania for instance. But for what it seeks to address, through the eyes of those who apparently experienced it, the movie seems amazingly respectful of a number of individual, family, faith, and even patriotic convictions of the key participants.  Amazing for the unholy-hood* crowd more generally speaking and for OS in particular.  People (directors and unholy-hood* types) can change and this film "World Trade Center" imho offers hope and a reasonable perspective on hope by what it does say.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thanks Old and New Friends

Thank you Contender Kevin, Copper Fox, Joel, Matthew and others who weighed in on the charge of racism leveled against my blog likely over a misunderstanding of 'puddleglum'.  It is wonderful to know that you friends blog and that even people one has never met can discern meaning and intentionality in printed words in these days of hyper so-called post modernity.

I just came off a conference by IICS encouraging aspiring university profs and existing university profs to consider teaching cross culturally in the 10-40 window or in closed access countries to both serve developing and other nations and to better make the goodnews known with the implications seen in the life of an educator.  It was fabulous but I must say that communication can be quite challenging even in familiar cultures.  Again I'm quite pleased that apparently many are getting it.

At the conference I was reminded (not by the speakers but by the contexts) of a quote by a mainland Chinese student studying in the States.  He said, "In the USA it is safe to question political leaders and political thought, but it apparently is NOT so safe to question Darwinism.  But in China it is NOT safe to question political leaders or political thought but it is very safe, popular and even quite acceptable to question Darwin."

Issues of race, or gender, markets, just war theory, world view, issues of sexuality and power are all contexts where we are told 'angels fear to tread'.  Thanks for going there with me graciously.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

USA State Dept - Israel

It seems to me that the USA State Department has enough bipartisan stupidity about Israel to last for quite a long and painful time.   If memory serves me correctly it was our State Department that encouraged Israel to pull out of S. Lebanon to show Syria how much Israel really wanted peace.  That was under Clinton and Albright.

In more recent times our USA State Department has foolishly also encouraged Israel to pull out of Gaza to show the PA how much Israel really wanted peace.  Israel did so in both instances and now from the north Lebanon launches attacks from its southern borders into Israel, and from the south from Gaza missile fire enters Israel from Gaza formerly PA now one at the north and one from the south, the H's from hell, Hezbollah or Hamas.

Appeasement for peace.  Land for peace.  How many times do we have to replay this frankly stupid Jimmy Carter 8 track before we get with our current times?  Apparently Bush and Condi don't get it much better than Bill and Madaline.  Better to have respect than friendly overtures that are mere pretexts for re-arming and continuing the 'Israel shouldn't exit' mantra.  When will we take these nations at their repeated assertion word?  They don't want Israel to exist at all, anywhere, anytime.  And we believe they should exist and will stand with them regardless of what appeasement Europe or anyone else has to say.

Israel should have defensible borders.  The State Department and whatever Presidential administrations are passing through, need to wake up to this reality and just do the right thing with conviction, courage, and strength. 

Krauthammer gets it right here: http://www.townhall.com/columnists/CharlesKrauthammer/2006/07/14/who_is_at_fault
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I like TownHall

As my first posted blog on TownHall as Puddleglum, let me begin with a word of encouragement.  I like TownHall a LOT.  I appreciate the insights of most of its contributors most of the time and this is unusual for me with most media and blogs, so I'm happy to have a free blog with TownHall.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »